Lilian Poling vs Thea Donarski Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: In recent performance analysis, Donarski won 0% of points on their second serve, while Poling managed to win 40.63%. Which player shows stronger performance in this area? Clearly, Poling has a significant edge.
• Return Game Stats: Examining returns, Donarski won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, and Poling achieved 51.56%. For first serve returns, Donarski again recorded 0%, whereas Poling reached 37.25%. Who can capitalize better during returns? Poling stands out with superior return capabilities.
• Under Pressure Analysis: While Donarski has not saved any breakpoints recently, Poling has saved 47.86%. Who handles pressure better? Once again, Poling demonstrates resilience under match pressure.
• Performance Overview: Over the last year, Donarski has only won 25% of matches, whereas Poling has a winning rate of 51.72%. Which player has better overall performance? Poling shows a more consistent win record.
• Best Surface Analysis: Donarski has a 25% win rate on I.hard, and none on Hard. Poling fares better on Clay with a 55% win rate, showing a slight weakness on I.hard at 43%. Does the surface play to any specific advantage? Poling's performance is more balanced across surfaces.
• Player Level: Over the past year, Donarski participated mostly in $10K tournaments with a 33.33% win rate; Poling also competed at the same level but with a 55.17% win rate. Who has better results at these events? Poling edges out with superior results.
• Opponent Quality Stats: Donarski faced opponents with an average rank of 222.75, compared to Poling's opponents with an average rank of 318.1. Who faced tougher competitors? Donarski's competition was slightly stronger.
• Deciding Set Performance: In the past year, Donarski did not win any deciding sets, whereas Poling succeeded 60% of the time. Who is likely to perform better if the match goes down to the wire? Poling is more likely to handle the pressure successfully.
• Break Point Conversion: Poling converted 42.64% of their breakpoint opportunities compared to Donarski's 0%. This suggests who may capitalize better on crucial moments, and it is Poling who has the advantage.

Editorial Prediction (July 13, 2025, UTC):

As we analyze the recent statistics, Poling has a clear advantage in multiple areas. They have demonstrated significantly stronger recent form in second serve performances and the ability to convert breakpoint opportunities, which is crucial in determining match momentum.

Not only has Poling shown resilience under pressure by saving a considerable percentage of breakpoints, but their overall match win rate is also notably higher than Donarski's. Surface preferences and event levels also tilt the scales in Poling's favor, displaying more consistent performance across different conditions.

Therefore, while Donarski has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents, the overall strengths and recent form of Poling make them the more likely candidate to win the upcoming match.